The first Take It Down Act sentence is 15 years — and Ohio has no deepfake law at all
A man in Ohio made fake sexual images of real people, including boys from his own neighbourhood, and posted them. On Tuesday he became the first person in the country sentenced under the new federal law.
James Strahler, 38, from Ohio, was sentenced to 15 years in prison on Tuesday. Investigators found more than 3,000 real and AI-generated abuse images on his devices, according to a press release from the U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Ohio, cited by 404 Media.
He is the first person in the country convicted of violating the Take It Down Act — the first federal law in the United States that makes it a crime to knowingly publish, or threaten to publish, sexual images of someone without consent, including ones generated by software. It took effect in May, in the gap between Strahler's first arrest and his federal charges.
The detail that makes this story land is how ordinary the starting point was. A woman told police that she and her mother had received 31 calls and texts in nine days: threats of sexual assault, extortion, and images of her changing clothes and using the bathroom inside her own home. Court records, per the Columbus Dispatch, say other messages included AI-made photos showing her in sexual situations with several men, including male relatives.
Here is the mechanic that matters to everyone reading this. Ohio has no law that specifically addresses deepfakes. Several states do; Ohio is not one of them. Under state law, what Strahler was first charged with were misdemeanours — he was charged in January, released, and court records show he kept stalking and harassing his victims. In April came more misdemeanour charges; he pleaded guilty to cyberstalking, producing obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse and publication of digital forgeries, and walked out on a $50,000 bond. In June more women came forward, police handed the case to the FBI, and the federal charges arrived. The same conduct went from a local nuisance file to 15 years in prison because a federal law now exists.
The law didn't change what he did. It changed what a court could do about it.
There is a second, stranger line being drawn at the same time. Last month a federal appeals court panel found, leaning on legal precedent from decades ago, that the First Amendment protects possession at home of AI-generated child sexual abuse material — as long as the image doesn't depict a child who exists in real life. In that case, a software engineer had allegedly used generative tools to make "hyper-realistic" material showing fake children. The possession charges were dropped. He still faces charges for producing and distributing. Read the two rulings side by side and the emerging test is brutally simple: is there a real person in the picture?
That test is why this isn't a niche crime story. Strahler made images of minor boys "from his community" and posted more than 700 pictures of real victims and animated persons to a site dedicated to child sexual abuse. He didn't need to be near anyone. He needed pictures — and pictures of almost all of us are already online.
Anyone whose face has been on the internet for a decade — which is nearly everyone under 40 with an old profile photo, a group shot from university, a work headshot. You don't get a say in who downloads it. It also touches parents and teenagers in one specific way: the victims here included boys from the man's own neighbourhood, so the danger wasn't a stranger on another continent. And it touches anyone who has ever gone to the police with screenshots and been told the charge is a misdemeanour: what happened here shows the difference the right law makes when it exists — and the hole where it doesn't.
Two things to watch, both named in the reporting. First, the software engineer whose possession charges were dropped still faces charges for producing and distributing — that case will test how far the "fake children aren't real children" logic goes. No date was given. Second, free speech advocates and First Amendment experts have flagged the Take It Down Act's 48-hour window for platforms to pull flagged content, warning it can be misused for censorship; the first serious fight over that clause hasn't happened yet. Beyond that, nobody named a timeline.
The courts are converging on a rule that sounds reassuring and isn't: a fake person is speech, a real person is a crime. It puts the whole weight of the law on whether a face can be traced back to someone alive. Face recognition is getting better at that every month. So is the software that invents faces that belong to nobody.
Sources: 404 Media, Samantha Cole, Sep 9, 2026, citing a press release from the U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Ohio, and reporting by the Columbus Dispatch.
Первый в США приговор по закону Take It Down — 15 лет тюрьмы — показывает, что за созданные нейросетью интимные изображения реальных людей теперь сажают, и это касается любого, чьё фото есть в сети.
Written by THE TELL’s AI newsroom. how we work · corrections